Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Pavers

Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Pavers is unique in a series of research studies covering the lubricants market in Russia.
The report focuses on the paver segment, the hydraulic systems of which take an average 100-115 liters per unit of equipment. Such large figures give special status to the segment from the standpoint of lubricant consumption even through the fleet of pavers is quite small.
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Pavers is an in-depth analysis of the most efficient types of hydraulic fluids for pavers used in mobile construction equipment developed according to international standards and characterized by high performance.

The research study examines hydraulic fluids market capacity with segmentation by viscosity and performance. An analysis of the state of the paver market is provided, along with the overall situation in the road construction vehicle segment.

Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Pavers contains:
• Specifications for lubricants of all leading manufacturers of hydraulic systems and mobile equipment
• Requirements of international and national standards for the above-mentioned lubricants
• Comparison of requirements by key parameters
• Comparison of lubes by the most requested viscosity and operating classes
• Data on the existing fleet of pavers and its place in the structure of advanced highway engineering
• Information on hydraulic lubricants which are used for road construction equipment and are approved by OEM producers
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Pavers also analyzes the competitive environment on the market with a special focus on niches of high commercial potential.


The study is a source of valuable information for:
• lubricantsproducers
• lubricantsdealersanddistributors
• mobileconstructionOEMs

1. Project Overview
1.1 Research Topic
1.2 Research Segmentation
1.3 Research Goal
1.4 Research Timeframe
1.5 Research Method
2. Road Construction Vehicle Fleet
2.1. Paver Segment
2.1.1. Paver Import Dynamics
2.1.2. Domestic Paver Production Dynamics
2.1.3. Paver Market Size Dynamics
2.1.4. Paver Fleet Size
2.2. Overall Road Construction Vehicle Fleet Size
3. Mobile Construction Vehicle Manufacturer Analysis
3.1. Asphalt Spreader Segment
3.1.1. Asphalt Spreader Fleet by Manufacturer
3.1.2. Asphalt Spreader Fleet Segmented by Manufacturer and Hydraulic System Volume
3.1.3. Asphalt Spreader Fleet Segmented by Manufacturer and Hydraulic Fluid Type
4. Market Capacity
4.1. Total Market Capacity of Lubricants for Hydraulic Vehicles
4.2. Lubricant Segment Capacity Segmented by Lubricant Type
4.3. Lubricant Segment Capacity, Breakdown by Product Type and Construction Vehicle Manufacturer
4.4. The Market Capacity of High Performance Hydraulic Oils in Monetary Terms
4.5. Segment “Asphalt Spreaders”
4.5.1. Oil Market Capacity for Asphalt Spreaders
4.5.2. Market of Capacity Oils for Asphalt Spreaders with Respect to Oils Range Segmentation
5. Competitive Analysis
5.1. CJSC JSOPC Bashneft
5.1.1. Contact Information
5.1.2. Production GeoFigurey
5.1.3. Description of Oil Product Mix for Hydraulic Equipment
5.1.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.2. LLC Gazpromneft – lubricants
5.2.1. Contact Information
5.2.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.2.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.2.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.3. LLC LLK-International
5.3.1. Contact Details
5.3.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.3.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.3.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.4. OJSC NK Rosneft
5.4.1. Contact Information
5.4.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.4.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.4.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.5. OJSC NK Russneft
5.5.1. Contact Information
5.5.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.5.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.5.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.6. LLC TNK lubricants
5.6.1. Contact Information
5.6.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.6.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.6.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.7. OJSC AZMOL
5.7.1. Contact Information
5.7.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.7.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.7.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.8. Castrol
5.8.1. Contact Information

5.8.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.8.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.8.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.9. Chevron global lubricants
5.9.1. Contact Information
5.9.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.9.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.9.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.10. Exxonmobil
5.10.1. Contact Information
5.10.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.10.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.10.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.11. Shell
5.11.1. Contact Information
5.11.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.11.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.11.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.12. Total
5.12.1. Contacts
5.12.2. Manufacturing reach
5.12.3. Line-up of hydraulic fluids
5.12.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
6. Benchmarking Study of Market Segments
6.1. Most promising vehicles from HPHF market capacity perspectives
6.2. Most promising manufacturers from HPHF market capacity analysis
6.3. Market capacity by segments with key manufacturers and their products
6.4. Correspondence of products from lubricants manufacturers with most receptive market segments
7. Market Trends and Outlook
7.1. Factors influencing the absorption capacity of HPHF market
7.2. Prospects for the development / dynamics of changes in the HPHF market capacity

Figure 2.1. Paver imports to Russia in 2001-2009, pcs..
Figure 2.2. Russia's domestic paver production in 1995-2009, pcs.
Figure 2.3. Russian paver market size in 2001-2009, pcs.
Figure 2.4. Russian paver market size in 2001-2009, breakdown by vehicle origin, pcs.
Figure 2.5. Russian paver market in 2001-2009, breakdown by vehicle origin, percent
Figure 2.6. Russia's paver fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Figure 2.7. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Figure 2.8 Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, breakdown by equipment type, pcs.
Figure 3.1. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, pcs.
Figure 3.2. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.3. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume under 75 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.4. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 75 to 155 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.5. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 155 to 185 liters, percent of pcs
Figure 3.6. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 185 to 210 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.7. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 210 to 240 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.8. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume over 240 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.9. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, segmented by fluid type, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.10. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46HM fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.11. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46HV fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.12. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 68HV fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.13. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 100HV fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.14. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using engine oils in hydraulic systems, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.15. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using OEM-specific lubricants in hydraulic systems, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.16. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using GOST lubricants, pcs.
Figure 3.17. Russia's HPHF-applicable asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by OEM, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.18. Russia's HPHF-applicable asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, percent of pcs.
Figure 4.1. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, percent of liters
Figure 4.2. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, segmented by fluid type, percent of liters
Figure 4.3. Capacity of the Russian market of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.4. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.5. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.6. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance lubricants 22 HM for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.7. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 НМ lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.8. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 НV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.9. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.10. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.11. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.12. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.13. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 100 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.14. Capacity of the Russian market* of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.15. Capacity of the Russian market of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by lubricant manufacturer and segment, percent of liters
Figure 4.16. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance OEM fluids for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.17. Average cost of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR per liter, 2010
Figure 4.18. Market capacity of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR, 2010
Figure 4.19. Market capacity* of high performance oils for asphalt spreaders with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.20. Oil market capacity for asphalt spreaders with respect to oils range segmentation, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.21. Market capacity*of 46 HM high performance oils for asphalt spreaders with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.22. Market capacity* of 46 HV high performance oils for asphalt spreaders with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.23. Market capacity* of 68 HV high performance oils for asphalt spreaders with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.24. Market capacity* of 100 HV high performance oils for asphalt spreaders with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.25. Market capacity* of engine oils for asphalt spreader hydraulic systems with respect to equipment manufacturers, 2009
Figure 4.26. Market capacity of engine oils for asphalt spreader hydraulic systems with respect to manufacturers of equipment and oil segments, RF, liters, 2009

Figure 4.27. Market capacity* of OEM high performance oils for asphalt spreaders with respect to equipment manufacturers, 2009
Figure 7.1 The dynamics of the HPHF market capacity, liters, by the year’s end, 2009-2012.

Table 2.1. Paver imports to Russia in 2001-2009, pcs.
Table 2.2. Russia's domestic paver production in 1995-2009, pcs.
Table 2.3. Russian paver market size in 2001-2009, pcs.
Table 2.4. Russian paver market size in 2001-2009, breakdown by vehicle origin, pcs.
Table 2.5. Russian paver market size in 2001-2009, breakdown by vehicle origin, percent
Table 2.6. Russia's paver fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Table 2.7. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Table 2.8. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, breakdown by equipment type, pcs.
Table 3.1. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, pcs.
Table 3.2. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, pcs.
Table 3.3. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume under 75 liters, pcs.
Table 3.4. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 75 to 155 liters, pcs.
Table 3.5. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 155 to 185 liters, pcs.
Table 3.6. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 185 to 210 liters, pcs.
Table 3.7. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 210 to 240 liters, pcs.
Table 3.8. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume over 240 liters, percent of pcs.
Table 3.9. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet fleet in 2009, segmented by fluid type, pcs.
Table 3.10. . Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46HM fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.11. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46HV fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.12. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 68HV fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.13. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 100HV fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.14. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using engine oils in hydraulic systems, pcs.
Table 3.15. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using OEM-specific lubricants in hydraulic systems, pcs.
Table 3.16. Russia's asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using GOST lubricants, pcs.
Table 3.17. Russia's HPHF-applicable asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by OEM, pcs.
Table 3.18. Russia's HPHF-applicable asphalt spreader fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, pcs.
Table 4.1. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, liters
Table 4.2. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, segmented by fluid type, liters
Table 4.3. Capacity of the Russian market of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.4. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.5. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.6. Capacity of the Russian market * of high-performance lubricants 22 HM for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.7. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 НМ lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.8. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 НV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.9. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.10. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.11. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.12. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.13. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 100 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.14. Capacity of the Russian market* of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.15. Capacity of the Russian market of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by lubricant manufacturer and segment, liters
Table 4.16. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance OEM lubricants for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.17. Average cost of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR per liter, 2010
Table 4.18. Market capacity of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR, 2010
Table 4.19. Market capacity* of high performance oils for asphalt spreaders with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.20. Market capacity of oils for asphalt spreaders with respect to oils range segmentation, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.21. Market capacity* of 46 HM high performance oils for asphalt spreaders with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.22. Market capacity* of 46 HV high performance oils for asphalt spreaders with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.23. Market capacity* of 68 HV high performance oils for asphalt spreaders with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.24. Market capacity* of 100 HV high performance oils for asphalt spreaders with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.25. Market capacity* of engine oils for asphalt spreader hydraulic systems with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.26. Market capacity engine oils for asphalt spreader hydraulic systems with respect to equipment and oil segments manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.27. Market capacity* of OEM high performance oils for asphalt spreaders with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 6.1. Comparative Product Mixes of Different Companies, 2010
Table 6.2. Demand and Supply Matching on HPHF Market, 2010
Table 7.1. Targets of FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), “Road Facilities” Subprogram
Table 7.2. Activities within FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), “Road Facilities” Subprogram, by Years
Table 7.3. Activities within FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), Road Facilities Subprogram, by Years, Updated in 2009
Table 7.4. Extension of Paved Motor Roads, km, 2000-2008
Table 7.5. The Volume of Construction Works in Actual Prices of 2007-2008, million rubles
Table 7.6. Commissioning of Residential and Non-residential Buildings, sq m, 2007-2008
Table 7.7. Investments in Oil Field Surface Facilities, billion rubles, 2010-2015