Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Dump Trucks
|
Release date:
July 2010
Language:
English, Russian
Volume:
159 pages
Format:
book and cd (print-out protected)
Delivery:
express mail (2-4 days)
Price:
850 ˆ
|
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Dump Trucks is unique in a series of research studies covering the lubricants market in Russia.
The report focuses on the dump truck segment, servicing of which accounts for 22-25% of annual consumption of hydraulic oils in the road construction vehicles segment.
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Dump trucks is an in-depth analysis of the most efficient types of hydraulic fluids for dump trucks used as mobile construction equipment developed according to international standards and characterized by high performance.
The research study examines hydraulic fluids market capacity with segmentation by viscosity and performance. An analysis of the state of the dump truck market is provided, along with the overall situation in the road construction vehicle segment.
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Dump Trucks contains:
• Specifications for lubricants of all leading manufacturers of hydraulic systems and mobile equipment
• Requirements of international and national standards for the above-mentioned lubricants
• Comparison of requirements by key parameters
• Comparison of lubes by the most requested viscosity and operating classes
• Data on the existing fleet of dump trucks and its place in the structure of advanced highway engineering
• Information on hydraulic lubricants which are used for road construction equipment and are approved by OEM producers
Russian Market for High-Performance Hydraulic Fluids: Dump trucks alsoanalyzes competitive environment on the market with a special focus on niches of high commercial potential.
The study is a source of valuable information for:
• lubricantsproducers
• lubricantsdealersanddistributors
• mobileconstructionOEMs
1. Project Overview
1.1 Research Topic
1.2 Research Segmentation
1.3 Research Goal
1.4 Research Timeframe
1.5 Research Method
2. Road Construction Vehicle Fleet
2.1. Dump Truck Segment
2.1.1. Dump Truck Import Dynamics
2.1.2. Domestic Dump Truck Production Dynamics
2.1.3. Dump Truck Market Size Dynamics
2.1.4. Dump Truck Fleet Size
2.2. Overall Road Construction Vehicle Fleet Size
3. Mobile Construction Vehicle Manufacturer Analysis
3.1. Dump Truck Segment
3.1.1. Dump Truck Fleet by Manufacturer
3.1.2. Dupm Truck Fleet Segmented by Manufacturer and Hydraulic System Volume
3.1.3. Dump Truck Fleet Segmented by Manufacturer and Hydraulic Fluid Type
4. Market Capacity
4.1. Total Market Capacity of Lubricants for Hydraulic Vehicles
4.2. Lubricant Segment Capacity Segmented by Lubricant Type
4.3. Lubricant Segment Capacity, Breakdown by Product Type and Construction Vehicle Manufacturer
4.4. The Market Capacity of High Performance Hydraulic Oils in Monetary Terms
4.5. Segment “Dump Trucks”
4.5.1. Oil Market Capacity for Dump Trucks
4.5.2. Market Capacity of Oils for Dump Trucks with Respect to Oils Range Segmentation
5. Competitive Analysis
5.1. CJSC JSOPC Bashneft
5.1.1. Contact Information
5.1.2. Production GeoFigurey
5.1.3. Description of Oil Product Mix for Hydraulic Equipment
5.1.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.2. LLC Gazpromneft – lubricants
5.2.1. Contact Information
5.2.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.2.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.2.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.3. LLC LLK-International
5.3.1. Contact Details
5.3.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.3.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.3.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.4. OJSC NK Rosneft
5.4.1. Contact Information
5.4.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.4.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.4.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.5. OJSC NK Russneft
5.5.1. Contact Information
5.5.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.5.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.5.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.6. LLC TNK lubricants
5.6.1. Contact Information
5.6.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.6.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.6.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.7. OJSC AZMOL
5.7.1. Contact Information
5.7.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.7.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.7.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.8. Castrol
5.8.1. Contact Information
5.8.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.8.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.8.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.9. Chevron global lubricants
5.9.1. Contact Information
5.9.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.9.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.9.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.10. Exxonmobil
5.10.1. Contact Information
5.10.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.10.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.10.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.11. Shell
5.11.1. Contact Information
5.11.2. Manufacturing geoFigurey
5.11.3. Description of assortment range of lubricants for hydraulic vehicles
5.11.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
5.12. Total
5.12.1. Contacts
5.12.2. Manufacturing reach
5.12.3. Line-up of hydraulic fluids
5.12.4. Correlation between the line-up and segments under study
6. Benchmarking Study of Market Segments
6.1. Most promising vehicles from HPHF market capacity perspectives
6.2. Most promising manufacturers from HPHF market capacity analysis
6.3. Market capacity by segments with key manufacturers and their products
6.4. Correspondence of products from lubricants manufacturers with most receptive market segments
7. Market Trends and Outlook
7.1. Factors influencing the absorption capacity of HPHF market
7.2. Prospects for the development / dynamics of changes in the HPHF market capacity
Figure 2.1. Dump truck imports to Russia in 2001-2009, pcs.
Figure 2.2. Russia's domestic dump truck production in 1995-2009, pcs.
Figure 2.3. Russian dump truck market size in 2001-2009, pcs.
Figure 2.4. Russian dump truck market size in 2001-2009, breakdown by vehicle origin, pcs.
Figure 2.5. Russian dump truck market size in 2001-2009, breakdown by vehicle origin, percent
Figure 2.6. Russia's dump truck fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Figure 2.7. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Figure 2.8 Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, breakdown by equipment type, pcs.
Figure 3.1. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent.
Figure 3.2. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.3. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume under 100 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.4. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 25 to 60 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.5. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 60 to 100 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.6. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 100 to 135 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.7. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 135 to 200 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.8. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume over 200 liters, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.9. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, segmented by fluid type, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.10. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 15HM fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.11. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 22HM fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.12. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 32HM fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.13. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 32HV fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.14. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46HM fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.15. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46HV fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.16. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 68HM fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.17. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using engine oils in hydraulic systems, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.18. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using OEM-specific lubricants in hydraulic systems, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.19. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using GOST lubricants, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.20. Russia's HPHF-applicable dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by OEM, percent of pcs.
Figure 3.21. Russia's HPHF-applicable dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, percent of pcs.
Figure 4.1. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, percent of liters
Figure 4.2. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, segmented by fluid type, percent of liters
Figure 4.3. Capacity of the Russian market of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.4. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.5. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.6. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance lubricants 22 HM for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.7. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 ÍÌ lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.8. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 ÍV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.9. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.10. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.11. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.12. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.13. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 100 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.14. Capacity of the Russian market* of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.15. Capacity of the Russian market of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by lubricant manufacturer and segment, percent of liters
Figure 4.16. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance OEM fluids for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, percent of liters
Figure 4.17. Average cost of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR per liter, 2010
Figure 4.18. Market capacity of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR, 2010
Figure 4.19. Market capacity* of high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.20. Market capacity of oils for dump trucks with respect to oils range segmentation, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.21. Market capacity* of 15 HM high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.22. Market capacity* of 22 HM high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.23. Market capacity* of 32 HM high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.24. Market capacity*of 32 HV high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.25. Market capacity* of 46 HM high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.26. Market capacity* of 46 HV high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.27. Market capacity* of 68 HM high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.28. Market capacity* of engine oils for dump truck hydraulic systems with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 4.29. Market capacity of engine oils for dump truck hydraulic systems with respect to manufacturers of equipment and oil segments, RF, liters, 2009
Figure 4.30. Market capacity* of OEM high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, % of liters, 2009
Figure 7.1 The dynamics of the HPHF market capacity, liters, by the year’s end, 2009-2012.
Table 2.1. Dump truck imports to Russia in 2001-2009, pcs.
Table 2.2. Russia's domestic dump truck production in 1995-2009, pcs.
Table 2.3. Russian dump truck market size in 2001-2009, pcs.
Table 2.4. Russian dump truck market size in 2001-2009, breakdown by vehicle origin, pcs.
Table 2.5. Russian dump truck market size in 2001-2009, breakdown by vehicle origin, percent
Table 2.6. Russia's dump truck fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Table 2.7. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, pcs.
Table 2.8. Russia's road construction vehicle fleet size in 2009, breakdown by equipment type, pcs.
Table 3.1. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, pcs.
Table 3.2. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, pcs.
Table 3.3. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume under 25 liters, pcs.
Table 3.4. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by OEM, hydraulic system volume 25 to 60 liters, pcs.
Table 3.5. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 60 to 100 liters, pcs.
Table 3.6. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 100 to 135 liters, pcs.
Table 3.7. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume 135 to 200 liters, pcs.
Table 3.8. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, hydraulic system volume over 200 liters, pcs.
Table 3.9. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, segmented by fluid type, percent of pcs.
Table 3.10. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 15HM fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.11. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 22HM fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.12. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 32HM fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.13. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 32HV fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.14. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46HM fluid segment, percent of pcs.
Table 3.15. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 46HV fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.16. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer for 68HM fluid segment, pcs.
Table 3.17. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using engine oils in hydraulic systems, pcs.
Table 3.18. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using OEM-specific lubricants in hydraulic systems, pcs.
Table 3.19. Russia's dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer in the segment using GOST lubricants, pcs.
Table 3.20. Russia's HPHF-applicable dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by OEM, pcs.
Table 3.21. Russia's HPHF-applicable dump truck fleet in 2009, breakdown by hydraulic system volume, pcs.
Table 4.1. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, liters
Table 4.2. Capacity of the Russian market* of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, segmented by fluid type, liters
Table 4.3. Capacity of the Russian market of HPHF for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.4. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.5. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 15 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.6. Capacity of the Russian market * of high-performance lubricants 22 HM for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.7. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 ÍÌ lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.8. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 32 ÍV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.9. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.10. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 46 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.11. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HM lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.12. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 68 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.13. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance 100 HV lubricants for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.14. Capacity of the Russian market* of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.15. Capacity of the Russian market of engine oils for hydraulic systems of construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by lubricant manufacturer and segment, liters
Table 4.16. Capacity of the Russian market* of high-performance OEM lubricants for construction vehicles in 2009, breakdown by manufacturer, liters
Table 4.17. Average cost of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR per liter, 2010
Table 4.18. Market capacity of high performance hydraulic oils, RF, RUR, 2010
Table 4.19. Market capacity* of high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.20. Oil market capacity for dump trucks with respect to oils range segmentation, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.21. Market capacity* of 15 HM high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.22. Market capacity* of 22 HM high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.23. Market capacity*of 32 HM high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.24. Market capacity* of 32 HV high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.25. Market capacity* of 46 HM high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.26. Market capacity* of 46 HV high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.27. Market capacity* of 68 HM high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.28. Market capacity* of engine oils for dump truck hydraulic systems with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.29. Market capacity of engine oils for dump truck hydraulic systems with respect to manufacturers of equipment and oil segments, RF, liters, 2009
Table 4.30. Market capacity* of OEM high performance oils for dump trucks with respect to equipment manufacturers, RF, liters, 2009
Table 6.1. Comparative Product Mixes of Different Companies, 2010
Table 6.2. Demand and Supply Matching on HPHF Market, 2010
Table 7.1. Targets of FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), “Road Facilities” Subprogram
Table 7.2. Activities within FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), “Road Facilities” Subprogram, by Years
Table 7.3. Activities within FTP Modernization of Russian Transport System (2002-2010), Road Facilities Subprogram, by Years, Updated in 2009
Table 7.4. Extension of Paved Motor Roads, km, 2000-2008
Table 7.5. The Volume of Construction Works in Actual Prices of 2007-2008, million rubles
Table 7.6. Commissioning of Residential and Non-residential Buildings, sq m, 2007-2008
Table 7.7. Investments in Oil Field Surface Facilities, billion rubles, 2010-2015
Back to the section
|
Your shopping cart is empty
|
|